|
By Sherine Shawky, M.D., Dr.P.H.
Research Professor,
The
American University in Cairo
Since the
first AIDS cases in the Middle East and North Africa
(MENA) were declared in 1984, the HIV threat has been
touching one country after another. Despite the fact
that HIV prevalence is still believed to be relatively
low, the epidemic’s growth in the MENA region is
undeniable, and the possibility that it will spin to a
generalized epidemic cannot be excluded.
The
detection of increasing numbers of HIV cases, the
identification of multiple routes of transmission, and
the existence of several high risk and vulnerable groups
indicate that the region is not immune against the
spread of HIV. The conservative culture in the region
has helped in slowing down the progression of the
epidemic, but has also contributed markedly to the
strong stigmatization of people practicing risk
behaviors as well as people living with HIV. Cultural
norms, coupled with lack of awareness of the
multidimensional disasters created by AIDS, have
excluded the HIV menace from the MENA policy agenda.
Rigid stigma has also led to a widespread denial of HIV
risk behaviors. As in other regions, the arrival and
threat of HIV in the MENA region is blamed upon
foreigners and outsiders. Within the region, conducting
HIV behavioral research is perceived as opposed to
cultural norms and as providing approval of risk
behaviors.
This
tendency to downplay the importance of HIV’s epidemic
growth has resulted in lack of evidence, suppression of
facts, and delayed interventions. Since the advent of
the new millennium, HIV in the MENA region has attracted
the attention of the international community, the
national Ministries of Health and civil society, and
there have been several national and regional
activities. In several countries, a National AIDS
program (NAP) is rooted in the Ministry of Health to monitor the
epidemic, enhance HIV/AIDS reporting, and to ensure
blood safety and infectious control measures. The NAP
developed partnership with other national sectors,
international agencies and people living with HIV to
mount a multi-sector approach for addressing the HIV
epidemic. Civil society has been increasingly vocal
within the governmental processes and many NGOs have
become more engaged in HIV-related efforts. Youth
coalitions became active and youth interventions are
running. Multiple international organizations are
involved in supporting the NAP in developing national
strategic plans, establishing voluntary counseling and
testing units, building HIV capacities, implementing
awareness campaigns and conducting research projects.
Despite
these efforts, many countries still have no national
strategies to halt the growth of the HIV epidemic. Even
in the countries with HIV surveillance and awareness
interventions, the efforts remain inadequate, irregular,
fragmented, and far from effective. HIV knowledge and
awareness remain weak in the region, and there is
widespread and persistent stigma, with many
misconceptions still prevailing. Condoms are used very
little and are viewed as a family planning method rather
than as an HIV prevention means.
|
The surveillance system is skewed towards the
passive method, with active surveillance still rare.
The available HIV data are insufficient and suspect to
underestimation, and they do not allow for studying the
epidemiology of the HIV epidemic or monitoring trends.
Behavioral studies are still lagging behind and data on
risk behaviors are few. There is almost no research to
measure the HIV impact in the region, and the few
available studies are sporadic. Compared to
concentrated efforts in HIV case detection and
treatment- oriented actions, there is limited HIV
prevention outreach and social attention. Existing HIV
managerial, research and technical capacities also
cannot meet the need for HIV intervention.
The
pernicious challenges posed by HIV call for integrated
intra-regional efforts. HIV specialists need to share
experience, mount multi-center HIV research, and learn
from experiences in other regions. In the meantime, a
long term vision is vital and there remains a need for
capacity building and producing evidence to guide policy
decision making and to raise awareness. National and
international HIV activists are forcefully
calling for sensitizing policy makers, researchers,
community leaders and the media personnel on the HIV
threat, since raising the awareness of the general
public is a mainstay in the HIV prevention.
"The pernicious challenges posed by
HIV in the Middle East and North Africa call for
integrated intra-regional efforts. HIV specialists
need to share experience, mount multi-center HIV
research, and learn from experiences in other
regions."
To meet these challenges, there is a need to found a
regional HIV resource center to halt the HIV threat
despite the perception of current low HIV prevalence.
The center, by working in collaboration with the
national Ministries of Health, academia, civil society
and international agencies, would be a channel to
assemble efforts and build national, regional and
international partnerships. The center’s
multidisciplinary approach to public health would
strive to resolve the problems of insufficiency of data
and inadequacy of human capacities by generating HIV
knowledge, building HIV research and technical
capacities, supporting research, and raising the
regional awareness.
Starting in the year 2008, an exciting series of
activities in the MENA were initiated by the HIV Center
for Clinical and Behavioral Studies and the
UCLA
Program in Global Health. These are discussed in
more detail in the
lead feature story of this issue of the HIV
Center E-Newsletter. We look forward to crowning
them with a new MENA HIV center to enhance the quality
of HIV prevention science in the region.
Sherine Shawky, M.D., Dr.P.H. is
Research Professor at the Social Research Center at the
American University in Cairo. She is the coordinator of
a three-month training on “Research Methods for Guiding
Policy and Evaluation” and she is involved with health
research projects and development of educational
material for research methods, health inequities, HIV
surveillance, and HIV monitoring and evaluation. |